If you’ve ever tried to navigate the streets of North Carolina on two wheels, you might have felt like the deck was stacked against you. And you’d be right, thanks to the Strategic Transportation Investments law enacted in 2013, which essentially put bike lanes and pedestrian paths on the transportation funding blacklist. This law states that state funds can only be channeled into projects that primarily benefit drivers, pushing back crucial advancements in bike and pedestrian infrastructure.

Imagine you’re a planner, armed with ideas to make your city a haven for cyclists and pedestrians. But instead of a green light, you’re met with a bureaucratic stop sign saying, ‘Sorry, cars only.’ This law is like showing up to a potluck with a fresh salad only to find out it’s an all-dessert affair—disappointing and slightly misplaced. Now, though, there’s a ray of hope on the legislative horizon with proposals being discussed to amend this narrow-minded law, possibly paving the way for fund allocation that includes non-vehicular transportation.

You might think, why fuss over bike lanes? Well, multiple studies plus loads of international examples shout the benefits of supporting a bike-friendly cityscape. We’re talking health perks, reduced traffic congestion, environmental plusses like lesser emissions, and hey, financial savings—because trading gas for pedal power checks a lot of boxes. Not to mention, offering robust bike lanes and pedestrian paths generally nudges public sentiment from car-centric to multi-modal enthusiasms which can transform urban living.

Some may argue that prioritizing investment in vehicle infrastructure stimulates economic growth. However, consider this: shifting even a fraction of our focus toward accommodating bikes and evading a sea of endless pavement can lead to more vibrant, accessible cities. Imagine downtown spaces bustling with markets, parks, and community activities rather than rows of parked cars—and that’s barely scratching the surface of potential urban rejuvenation.

The policy shift suggested isn’t about pulling the rug out from transportation projects that have their merit but rather, weaving a broader tapestry. By rewriting this restrictive legislation, North Carolina could foster a more inclusive approach to public space usage that benefits all modes of transportation. Initiatives in progressive cities around the globe underscore the success of diversified transportation policies.

Pedal power should not be understated, and revising the law could kickstart a healthier, more connected North Carolina. Indeed, greener, safer, and more enthusiastic streets might be just one legislative amendment away. To the lawmakers of North Carolina: let’s champion a transit ethos that doesn’t just accommodate, but actively encourages, the thumps of sneakers on pavement and bike tires on bike lanes. After all, cities thrive when they cater to everyone—not just those behind the wheel.